The Man Who Changed The World

Its very interesting to watch this clip on youtube and see how much involvement the United States really had on so many years of Iranian history. The video describes how the United States CIA sets secret plans to alter the structure of the government with the Prime Minister and the Shah. There are two arguments for this action, 1) that the governmental structure of Iran should have nothing to do with the United States, and 2) the United States felt threatened by the situation and the Soviet influence that could greatly effect the States. Personally I'm not sure which argument I follow more. It just seems that the United States tries to run the world. But on the other hand you can't say that just because one nation does something that it doesn't affect the entire world. Sometimes it does, and sometimes we only think it will, but there is a big risk in waiting to find out how it will affect everything. Another interesting part of the video was when the Iranian students took over the US Embassy. Its amazing to see that they actually had support from government figures in Iran. You would never see that here in the United States, that our government would support such actions. Not to say it makes our government any better because it doesn't, but they are just completely different. It just seems like there is so much bad blood between these two nations that I don't know if it will ever be resolved. Certainly not anytime soon with our stance on war and the Middle East. Its like every government just does whatever they want, and if they don't get caught doing it then its not a problem, but when they do they always have an exit strategy. Politics seems to just be about corruption and coercion. Especially international politics.  

Bastard of Istanbul

The Bastard of Istanbul by Elif Shafak is a story that pins two families of different cultures and ethnicities against each other. Both families have their own identities and each family member in each family seems to have a separate identity at that. Their family history and the future will help each person find their true identity. Each person may think they know who they are now, but things can always change. Shafak attempts to display the true meaning and importance of a person’s own identity and how the main characters identities all tie in with each other by the end of the novel. 

            There seems to be a huge difference between generations and their perception on today’s society. There is the Turkish family from Istanbul, and the Armenian family that lives in the United States. In Istanbul there are a set of rules called the “Rules of Prudence for an Istanbulite Woman.” These are rules that were set into society many years ago. The elders seem to follow these rules, but a young Zeliha, a part of the Turkish family in Istanbul, seems to disregard all of these standards. She creates her own identity, whether it conforms to society or not she is who she is. She seems to break every one of the three golden rules of prudence and is unlike most women in Istanbul. Zeliha, when harassed on the streets responds back and swears at her harasser. She also looses her cool and breaks the second rule of prudence but reacting excessively to her harasser. The last thing she does to break the rules of an Istanbulite woman is not forgetting about her harasser and letting it affect the rest of her day. Possibly the biggest difference in her identity as a Turkish woman was her lack of faith in Allah. She resented Allah from a young age. Zeliha stands out in a crowd with her frizzy hair and shiny nose rings, but that is her identity, no matter who likes, or dislikes it, or who is watching. 

Touba

Shahruush Parsipur’s novel Touba and the Meaning of Life follows the story of a women’s life living in Iran through numerous major historical events. Through Touba’s life we see the struggles she encounters as a women, and the historical struggles Iran faces at the same time. The difficulties of the main character are a reflection of the difficulties of the nation. In the character of Touba, Parsipur explores the changing fortunes of Iran through 80 years of turbulent history.

Touba’s personal life is dramatically effected by events that happen in Iranian history. Every aspect of her life is changed in some way according to things that happen within the Iranian boarders. The 1909 coup against Mohammed Ali Shah dramatically affects Touba’s home life. In July of 1908, after months of political conflict, Mohammed Ali Shah authorized the Russian brigade to attack the parliament, then dissolve it and the constitution. Pro-constitutionalists in 1909 recruited a large armed force to march on Tehran. Mohammad Ali Shah then sought refuge in the Russian legation and departed from Iran. With Mohammad Ali Shah finding refuge away from Iran and the Qajar dynasty doing much of the same, including her husband the Qajar Prince, Touba is left to raise her four children alone. The fleeing and breakdown of the Qajar dynasty also represents the breakdown of Touba’s personal life and family. This is another example of how Touba’s life and the Iranian nation reflect each other.

Good News vs Bad News.

It seems today that everyone is more interested in the bad news vs the good news. It is like people like to hear bad news as its entertainment instead of realizing that it is really happening to people. After looking at CNN.com in the "Middle East" section there pops up about ten links for news stories, All of them being negative news. Maybe it is our perception as Americans on the situation or the region itself, but there has to be something good going on over there. I believe there is, its just we are so focused on the war and the conflict that we either miss, or completely ignore the good things that are happening over there. This actually doesn't mean the people of the United States are missing it, but the censorship and the corporate sponsors who say what type of news gets shown are either profiting from, or pushing certain news for their own benefit. Again the same happens when I go on nytimes.com. All bad news stories appear. This may alter the peoples perception of the Middle East because they never get to hear about whatever good things may be happening over there. Because we are at war all we want to know about is us and how we are doing over there, not how the people that live over there are doing. It seems like an obvious statement that only bad news gets air time, but many people do not really realize when they watch the news that it is mostly bad or negative stories.